認定試験の出題内容は定期的に見直されるため、古い教材で対策するのは危険です。CertShikenのNIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer問題集は購入後365日間無料で更新され、PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementerの最新傾向に沿った83問を使い続けられます。
PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer 試験概要:
| 認定ベンダー: | PECB |
|---|---|
| 試験名: | PECB認定 NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer |
| 試験番号: | NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer |
| 試験時間: | 180 分 |
| 試験形式: | 多肢選択式, 論述形式の問題 |
| 対応言語: | 英語, スペイン語, フランス語, ドイツ語 |
| 出題数: | 80 |
| 合格点: | 70% |
| 受験料: | USD 1000-1500 |
| 関連資格: | PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer PECB ISO/IEC 27032 Lead Cybersecurity Manager PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer |
| 認定の有効期間: | 3年(維持要件あり) |
| サンプル問題: | ![]() |
| 受験方法: | コンピュータベース試験(オンライン監督または認定試験センターでの対面受験) |
| 前提条件: | サイバーセキュリティの概念およびリスク管理に関する基礎知識が推奨されます。ISO/IEC 27001の基礎知識があると有益ですが、必須ではありません |
| 公式シラバスのURL: | https://www.pecb.com/en/nis2-directive-lead-implementer |
PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer 試験シラバストピック:
| セクション | 比重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| NIS 2 Directive実装戦略 | 20% | - ギャップ分析と評価
|
| ガバナンスとリスク管理の義務 | 20% | - ガバナンス・フレームワーク
|
| インシデント報告と協力 | 20% | - 当局との協力
|
| 技術的および組織的措置 | 25% | - セキュリティ措置の実装
|
| NIS 2 Directiveの概要と背景 | 15% | - NIS 2 Directiveの背景と根拠
|
PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementerに関するよくあるご質問
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementerは、PECBが実施する「PECB認定 NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer」の認定試験です。この試験に合格すると、「NIS 2 Directive」の認定を取得できます。認定レベルは上級 / Lead Implementerに位置づけられています。関連する認定にはPECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer、PECB ISO/IEC 27032 Lead Cybersecurity Manager、PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementerなどがあります。公式の出題範囲に沿って基礎から応用まで問われるため、CertShikenの83問の練習問題で出題傾向をつかんでおくと、効率的に対策を進められます。
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementerの出題数は80、試験時間は180 分です。試験時間を問題数で割ったペースをあらかじめ計算しておき、1問にかけられる時間を意識しながら解くことが大切です。難問に時間を使いすぎて後半が間に合わなくならないよう、本番前にCertShikenの模擬試験で制限時間付きの演習を重ね、時間配分の感覚を身につけておくと安心です。
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementerの合格点は70%、受験料はUSD 1000-1500です。不合格になった場合、再受験には再度全額の受験料がかかるため、本番の前にCertShikenの83問の練習問題で自己採点を行い、合格点を安定して上回れる状態にしておくことをおすすめします。
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementerの受験条件について、公式には次のように案内されています。サイバーセキュリティの概念およびリスク管理に関する基礎知識が推奨されます。ISO/IEC 27001の基礎知識があると有益ですが、必須ではありません最新かつ正確な条件は、必ず公式の試験概要ページでご確認ください。
はい。CertShikenではNIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer問題集の無料サンプルをご用意しており、収録問題の質や構成を購入前にお確かめいただけます。ご購入後は365日間の無料更新が付き、更新期間の終了後も50%割引で更新を継続できるため、長期的な学習にも安心してご利用いただけます。
万が一、ご購入後60日以内にNIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer試験を受験して不合格となった場合には「返金保証」が適用され、全額をご返金いたします。受験票(受験申込証明)のコピーと公式スコアレポート(Score Report)のPDFを試験実施後2日以内にご提出いただければ、提出後7日以内に手続きが完了します。なお、ご購入後3日以内の受験は対象外(準備期間が短すぎるため)、ダウンロードのみで実際に受験されなかった場合、無料資料や期限切れのご注文も対象外となり、受験者名とお支払い者名が一致している必要があります。返金の代わりに、同等価値の試験対策資料2つを無料でお受け取りいただく選択肢もあり、この場合は元の製品の更新サービスもそのまま継続してご利用いただけます。商品のお届けは、お支払い完了後すぐにダウンロードいただけるほか、1分以内にご登録のメールアドレスへもお送りします。2時間経っても届かない場合はカスタマーサポートまでご連絡ください。インストール可能なパソコンの台数に制限はありません。
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementerの出題範囲は、全部で5の分野で構成されています。主な分野としては、「技術的および組織的措置」(出題割合:25%)、「インシデント報告と協力」(出題割合:20%)、「ガバナンスとリスク管理の義務」(出題割合:20%)などが挙げられます。各分野の詳細なトピックと配点は、このページ上部に掲載している試験概要(出題範囲)にまとめていますので、学習計画を立てる際の参考にしてください。
PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer 認定 NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer 試験問題:
問題 #1
Which of the following entities are excluded from the scope of the NIS 2 Directive?
A. Public administration entities involved in law enforcement activities
B. Regulatory entities
C. Entities with only marginal relevance to the areas of national security, public security, defense, or law enforcement activities
問題 #2
Scenario 4: StellarTech is a technology company that provides innovative solutions for a connected world. Its portfolio includes groundbreaking Internet of Things (IoT) devices, high-performance software applications, and state-of-the-art communication systems. In response to the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape and the need to ensure digital resilience, StellarTech has decided to establish a cybersecurity program based on the NIS 2 Directive requirements. The company has appointed Nick, an experienced information security manager, to ensure the successful implementation of these requirements. Nick initiated the implementation process by thoroughly analyzing StellarTech's organizational structure. He observed that the company has embraced a well-defined model that enables the allocation of verticals based on specialties or operational functions and facilitates distinct role delineation and clear responsibilities.
To ensure compliance with the NIS 2 Directive requirements, Nick and his team have implemented an asset management system and established as asset management policy, set objectives, and the processes to achieve those objectives. As part of the asset management process, the company will identify, record, maintain all assets within the system's scope.
To manage risks effectively, the company has adopted a structured approach involving the definition of the scope and parameters governing risk management, risk assessments, risk treatment, risk acceptance, risk communication, awareness and consulting, and risk monitoring and review processes. This approach enables the application of cybersecurity practices based on previous and currently cybersecurity activities, including lessons learned and predictive indicators. StellarTech's organization-wide risk management program aligns with objectives monitored by senior executives, who treat it like financial risk. The budget is structured according to the risk landscape, while business units implement executive vision with a strong awareness of system-level risks. The company shares real-time information, understanding its role within the larger ecosystem and actively contributing to risk understanding. StellarTech's agile response to evolving threats and emphasis on proactive communication showcase its dedication to cybersecurity excellence and resilience.
Last month, the company conducted a comprehensive risk assessment. During this process, it identified a potential threat associated with a sophisticated form of cyber intrusion, specifically targeting IoT devices. This threat, although theoretically possible, was deemed highly unlikely to materialize due to the company's robust security measures, the absence of prior incidents, and its existing strong cybersecurity practices.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What organizational model has StellarTech embraced?
A. Matrix
B. Divisional
C. Functional
問題 #3
What is the key difference between Tier 2 and Tier 3 disaster recovery strategies?
A. Tier 2 mandates dual sites with peer-to-peer connections, whereas Tier 3 focuses on data transfer enhancement
B. Tier 2 involves electronic vaulting of critical data, while Tier 3 relies on offsite vaults
C. Tier 2 uses couriers to transport data between centers, while Tier 3 uses electronic vaulting of critical data
問題 #4
Which of the following statements regarding critical entities is correct?
A. Critical entities must provide one or more essential services and must have their critical infrastructure within the territory of the respective Member State
B. Critical entities are obligated to report only their names and relevant (sub)sectors to competent authorities
C. Member States can exclusively rely on self-registration mechanisms for the identification and reporting of all critical entities, with no direct oversight from the competent authorities
問題 #5
Scenario 2:
MHospital, founded in 2005 in Metropolis, has become a healthcare industry leader with over 2,000 dedicated employees known for its commitment to qualitative medical services and patient care innovation. With the rise of cyberattacks targeting healthcare institutions, MHospital acknowledged the need for a comprehensive cyber strategy to mitigate risks effectively and ensure patient safety and data security. Hence, it decided to implement the NIS 2 Directive requirements. To avoid creating additional processes that do not fit the company's context and culture, MHospital decided to integrate the Directive's requirements into its existing processes. To initiate the implementation of the Directive, the company decided to conduct a gap analysis to assess the current state of the cybersecurity measures against the requirements outlined in the NIS 2 Directive and then identify opportunities for closing the gap.
Recognizing the indispensable role of a computer security incident response team (CSIRT) in maintaining a secure network environment, MHospital empowers its CSIRT to conduct thorough penetration testing on the company's networks. This rigorous testing helps identify vulnerabilities with a potentially significant impact and enables the implementation of robust security measures. The CSIRT monitors threats and vulnerabilities at the national level and assists MHospital regarding real-time monitoring of their network and information systems. MHospital also conducts cooperative evaluations of security risks within essential supply chains for critical ICT services and systems. Collaborating with interested parties, it engages in the assessment of security risks, contributing to a collective effort to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector against cyber threats.
To ensure compliance with the NIS 2 Directive's reporting requirements, MHospital has streamlined its incident reporting process. In the event of a security incident, the company is committed to issuing an official notification within four days of identifying the incident to ensure that prompt actions are taken to mitigate the impact of incidents and maintain the integrity of patient data and healthcare operations. MHospital's dedication to implementing the NIS 2 Directive extends to cyber strategy and governance. The company has established robust cyber risk management and compliance protocols, aligning its cybersecurity initiatives with its overarching business objectives.
According to scenario 2, as a first step toward the NIS 2 Directive implementation, MHospital decided to conduct a gap analysis to assess its current state of the cybersecurity measures against the requirements outlined in the NIS 2 Directive. Is this in alignment with best practices?
A. No, the initial step should have been a scop assessment to determine the scope of the company's compliance
B. No, the initial step should have been a risk assessment to identify potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities
C. Yes, a gap analysis should be initially conducted before taking any further actions to implement the Directive
解説:
| 問題 #1 正解: A | 問題 #2 正解: C | 問題 #3 正解: C | 問題 #4 正解: A | 問題 #5 正解: C |
ヘルプがないなら、全額返金
CertShikenはヘルプがないなら、全額返金という承諾を通して、自分の商品に自信があります。我々が開発してから、我々の商品を利用して試験に失敗することを見たことがありません。このフィードバックで、我々はあなたの我々の商品から得る利益と試験に合格する高い可能性を確保できます。
我々は、あなたのNIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer - PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer 認証試験を準備するとき、あなたの投資する努力、時間とお金はあなたの失敗に悲しくて失望することを理解しています。我々はあなたの痛さと失望を減少することができなく、でも、我々はあなたの金融損失を担うことができます。
これは、ある原因のため、あなたは我々の商品を利用して試験に失敗したら、我々は我々の商品での支出をあなたに戻り返すことを表明します。あなたは試験に失敗してからの7日以内であなたの失敗した報告書を我々にメールを送るだけです。




大鸟**
Uehara
境*纪
伊东**
Shiraishi
佐久**

